AALGX vs. ^NDX

In the year-to-date period, AALGX achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly higher than ^NDX's -4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, AALGX has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 1.16%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) and NASDAQ 100 (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AALGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AALGX and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum AALGX drawdown since its inception was -67.94%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AALGX and ^NDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Thrivent Global Stock Fund (AALGX) is 5.57%, while NASDAQ 100 (^NDX) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that AALGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.